miss any of John's other HTML Emails? Click Here.
Services Web Site
world, Saturday, June 7, 2014. Net neutrality is in the news these
days. At issue is whether governments and Internet service providers
like Verizon will treat all information from the Internet equally,
without discriminating or charging different rates depending on user,
content, web site, or computer used. This is the way the Internet is
now and is also known as 'open Internet.' If net neutrality goes away
and we arrive at 'closed Internet,' things won't work the same or as
well. We can expect different technical standards in different
countries or even in different states, making it harder for computers
to communicate with each other. Internet speed may be artificially
degraded just so that service providers can charge more for faster
service. Maybe worse, those in charge will be able to filter out
content for moral, religious or business reasons, for example.
Keeping the Internet the way it is currently is a matter of enforcing
legal and technical regulations that were included when the Federal
Communications Commission enacted the Open Internet Order in 2010. Some
folks experience a knee-jerk reaction to the thought of imposed
regulations, but these are standards meant for those who design our
computers and the network hardware in them, and for those who sell us
Internet service. These large companies suppose that there is more
money to be made in a deregulated situation. It is the view of this
writer that Internet service costs enough already.
In January 2014, stemming from a Verizon lawsuit, the DC District Court
struck down the FCC's net neutrality rules as being based on a flawed
legal foundation, but that decision left it open for the FCC to decide
just how net neutrality should be reestablished. In April 2014, press
reports leaked details of the FCC's latest proposal. In it, service
providers are prevented from blocking or discriminating against
websites, but these service providers would be able to charge companies
for preferential treatment if THEY deemed it commercially reasonable.
This again opens us all up for service providers to choose winners and
losers and for the establishment of fast and slow lanes online.
The Chairman of the FCC is Tom Wheeler, a former cable company
lobbyist. PLEASE visit the FCC's website at http://www.fcc.gov/comments and
click Proceeding #14-28 on Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet,
and let Chairman Wheeler know how you feel about it all. You might also
write or call your Representatives and Senators. Of course, it's not a
bad idea to talk it up amongst ourselves as well. It's a sure bet that
we won't like the Internet if Verizon and Comcast get their way in this.
June 7, 2014